▲ 50 ▼ AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian (amp.theguardian.com) submitted 3 years ago by exohuman@kbin.social to c/technology@beehaw.org 83 comments fedilink hide all child comments Tech CEOs want us to believe that generative AI will benefit humanity. They are kidding themselves
[–] ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That assumes that the classes of problems that AI's can solve remains stagnant. I don't think that's a good assumption, especially given that GPT4 can already self-review and refine its output. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It will take a very long time for people to believe and trust AI. That's just the nature of trust. It may well surpass humant in always soon, but trust will take much more time. What would be required for an AI designed bridge be accepted without review by a human engineer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one 1 point 3 years ago We'll probably see sooner or later. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) It will take a very long time for people to believe and trust AI. That's just the nature of trust. It may well surpass humant in always soon, but trust will take much more time. What would be required for an AI designed bridge be accepted without review by a human engineer? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one 1 point 3 years ago We'll probably see sooner or later. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one 1 point 3 years ago We'll probably see sooner or later. permalink fedilink source parent