you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • no ads or sponsor crap (sponsor only if sponsor is <5s and only at the start of vid)
  • buffering is efficient and quick
  • subtitles available in widescreen, small etc
  • can change volume and resolution
  • can be judged by community with a non-karma system
  • little to no algorithm or AI slop
  • can custom select videos (by date, popularity, tags, or whatever)
  • peer to peer, decentralised and FOSS
  • privacy friendly
  • can download, usable offline
  • none of that copyright bullshit

In short, a no-nonsense normal video player without a profit motive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think he was answering the question "how good does a video player need to be?", because many of those points don't apply to pornhub, which also goes more into the site behind it than the player proper

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments