you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Native Arabic speaker here. Can confirm.

Although it’s not always as easy as it sounds because many words and expressions from back then aren’t relevant/in-use. Also, reading poetry from the pre-Islamic era is significantly more difficult. We still have volumes of literature (specifically poetry) that predate Islam.

The reason the language is so resilient is the use of the Quran as a reference (all translations of it aren’t considered Quran, but commentaries), and the fact we have institutes dedicated to maintaining and standardising the language as part of the Arab League (ALECSO and its subsidiaries, etc). Also, all nations of the Arab League enforce a rule that stipulates that the governments, newspapers, media/TV, and academia are required to use Modern Standard Arabic for official business across all member countries.

Regional dialects are kind of hard to understand at first, but generally speaking, we do understand each other regardless of the dialect if the two parties communicating work at it long enough. The hardest dialects to understand are from them pesky Moroccans/Tunisians with their French-every-other-word bastardisation of the language, but we figure it out eventually.

Edit: and I’m not bashing Moroccans/Tunisians/Algerians. We love you guys! ❤️

Edit: spelling, grammar

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't hold the French influence against them tbf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Neither do I. We have the same problem with English and German here in Egypt (especially in the recent decades and with the advent of the internet)

    Edit: also in sciences and tech, it’s becoming near impossible for the regulatory bodies involved to keep up and we have to use loan words to refer to things even in official documents.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    institutes dedicated to maintaining and standardising the language as part of the Arab League (ALECSO and its subsidiaries, etc)

    With successes like Arabic, French, Korean and Turkish I don't understand how the "Descriptivism vs. Prescriptivism" debate in the anglosphere is "Descriptivism : signature look of superiority", especially since their linguistic rules are filled with more exceptions than rules, and their spelling is atrocious (although I blame the Latin roots for that, since germanic languages manage just fine)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Depends on what you consider "success". English is the number one second language, after all. And besides, French, while highly regulated, is full of insanity like 420+2 you would expect a prescription would iron out, meanwhile the parts of English that were prescribed, like is*land or not ending on prepositions, are notably more weird than they would be normally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Depends on what you consider “success”.

    Being a well structured language that is consistent and easy to use. As in "high quality tool"

    English is the number one second language, after all.

    McDonalds is the worlds best resturant with that kind of logic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's the thing, though: McDonald's is well structured, easy to use, and consistent - unlike French. And, incidentally, a high quality tool isn't necessarily easy to use - like French.

    In fact, I'd argue English fits your three criteria: as it's effectively a pidgin at least once over, it lost damn near all grammatical structures (rendering it simple) and therefore depends on rigid (consistent) word ordering (structure).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    it lost damn near all grammatical structures (rendering it simple)

    But not consistent

    and therefore depends on rigid (consistent) word ordering (structure).

    yeah, having one aspect have rules but other parts descend into complete chaos because it's a bastard langauge doesn't make english consistent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    English is a vibes based language with lose grammer and spelling that enables people who speak wildly different native languages ti fairly effectively communicate. It's the giant bin of random Lego pieces of human languages. It's unruly, but anyone can pick it up fairly quickly and get to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    yes. which is why it sucks. It's like, yeah a swiss army knife is pretty cool I guess, but I don't want to debone and chop up a chicken into cubes with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    McDonalds is the worlds best resturant with that kind of logic.

    It is. It's the best at not being shit. You don't expect a gourmet meal, but you get very standardised food no matter where on the planet you are.

    Even Michelin star restaurant give you the shits more often than plain old MickeyD's which never fails to have the same mediocre quality.

    Just like broken English.

    Finnish can do a billion things English can't but English has hundreds of thousands of words, nearing a million if you count obsolete terms, whereas Finnish has barely 100 000 even when you do count even obsolete terms.

    So just like with McD, it's the usecase which matters. "Best" is such a subjective term if you don't define it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    “Best” is such a subjective term if you don’t define it.

    i did define it though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh. Please do point me to where you did such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Depends on what you consider “success”.

    Being a well structured language that is consistent and easy to use. As in “high quality tool”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, I thought you might refer to that.

    So, by that definition, you consider Toki Pona far more successful language than English, I take it?

    It is much better structured and far simpler to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm confused why you seem to think that because English is the most popular second language, that automatically means it is the best communication tool. Don't you think the reason it is so well-known is more because the US (and UK, to a lesser extent) is such a dominant force economically and militarily? That non-English-speaking states consider it important to learn, so they teach it early in school -- and then on top of that the largest film industry is in the US, so English content is pretty available?

    I mean, there is a lot more external force going behind the dissemination of English than that of Toki Pona, so I dunno, seems pretty silly to attribute it's "success" (popularity) to some internal aspect of the language.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    No no no no.

    YOU made a claim. I asked you how you define the "best" language. You clarified. Simplicity and good structure.

    Toki Pona definitely has better structure and is simpler than English.

    Yet you now refuse to stand behind the argument you made?

    "Sad."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I'm not the OP, I'm just asking you a genuine question dude. Why are you so friggin hot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh, youre a random interjecting. Sorry I don't pay attention to usernames when the content seems similar from the quality and content.

    Yeah Skullgrid makes the argument. By his criteria Toki Pona is better than English.

    I'm just asking why he would say such a ridiculous thing.

    Perhaps it's because he doesn't realise that how "good" a language is isn't anything as simple as "structure and simplicity".

    Perhaps you agree with him and would like to explain why you do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I didn't say that I agreed with them... You're kinda being a dick dude, why? All I said was that just because English is popular, doesn't mean it's an inherently "good" language, whatever that means. There are external factors that, I think, have more to do with its popularity than its inherent and independent usability as a tool.

    At first I just wanted to know if you didn't think that that was the case? But it doesn't seem like you actually want to converse and instead want an argument to win, so honestly I'm not really interested in what you have to say, now. Thanks for unmasking!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And I never said what you think I did.

    I'm merely pointing out his definition of what a language needs to be "successful" is insanely reductive.

    With his argument, Toki Pona is better than English.

    I haven't claimed anything about English. I'm asking him (or you) about the argument already made.

  • source
  • parent