you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if they weren't, you can't really glean anything reasonable from a candid photo like that. It's a fool's errand.

Imagine if a photo was taken when a child was walking by someone and tripped, but the guy grabbed the kid's arm and kept them from falling down. Timed right, a photo of that can be easily construed as the person forcefully dragging a child someplace.

It's absurdity. There's plenty that's much more worth everyone's attention, re Donald Trump's crimes, than interpreting candid photos.

  • source
  • parent