82
Opinion: Small screen, big investment: TV episodes have become way too long (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [M] to c/television@piefed.social
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Just the messenger! Discuss.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

I'm not too bothered by variable lengths but I do think the lack of time constraints can lead to bad writing and show making. If the episode needs to be 40 mins, fine, but sometimes it just feels like as no one is saying "cut this back, tighten it up" so episodes become uneven or series sprawl and never get to the end.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Disagree. I think a much more common problem is that there isn't enough good stuff to fill all of the available time, so the writers have to put more filler in and it makes the show terrible

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The traditional HBO model of being approximately 30 minutes or 60 minutes, more or less, was reasonable. Some episodes were long (Sopranos Season 4 finale was 75 minutes long, about 25% longer than its time slot), and some were short (Sopranos season 2, episode 8 was only 43 minutes). But they generally stuck around that time frame, and the majority of the episodes were between 50-60 minutes long.

    The Bear's shortest episode was 18 minutes. Most of its episodes are between 30-40 minutes. But it has two monster episodes, season 2's "Fishes" at 66 minutes, and Season 4's "Bears" at 69 minutes. Those ratios are way off, and hard to plan sequential non-binge watching. At a certain point it's disrespectful of the audience's time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent