you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Ok, fair enough. I also absolutely agree that we shaould have went for nuclear instead of coal, but now its to late and its faster to replace coal with renewables, than replacing it with nuclear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    but now its to late and its faster to replace coal with renewables, than replacing it with nuclear.

    Nope, that's bullshit. Nuclear development didn't stop in the 80s and you can't rely on renewables alone 'cos they're not constant. You need a stable supply.

  • source
  • parent