you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

You have scope insensitivity. What's worse, one person being raped or one million transgender people being denied civil rights? A typical bigot is less harmful than a typical rapist, but JK Rowling is not a typical transphobe; she's many orders of magnitude worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    you seem like the kind of person who would let the trolley run over five people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you're going to be deontologist about it, I can understand why you'd think you don't need to multiply the scope of JK Rowling's impact. And I can understand why you're ok with letting the trolley kill 4 more people than it needs to. Your morality is self-consistent, merely anathema to me. So, yeah, "I just don't agree with you."

    But -- maybe you don't need to mock me as though my common and standard understanding of the trolley problem is somehow idiotic. "Lemmy.ml everyone! A place where they'd willingly choose to kill 1 person to save 5 others."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments