▲ 985 ▼ Anon likes trains (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 304 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] pan0wski@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) Doesn't Europe have an extensive passenger train network? Yes and no. It depends on which part of Europe you are in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] slingstone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's a bit like that in the States, with a lot of the infrastructure appearing to be concentrated in the Northeast. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where there are lots of people close together, weird how that works... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago No. Used to be everywhere. That's just where people held onto it after. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago and that's the one legitimately good reason to oppose it. The city folk act like they are the only places in the world and completely ignore the rest of the country, the worlds largest ball of yarn wouldn't exist without small towns, neither would wal-mikes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's a bit like that in the States, with a lot of the infrastructure appearing to be concentrated in the Northeast. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where there are lots of people close together, weird how that works... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago No. Used to be everywhere. That's just where people held onto it after. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago and that's the one legitimately good reason to oppose it. The city folk act like they are the only places in the world and completely ignore the rest of the country, the worlds largest ball of yarn wouldn't exist without small towns, neither would wal-mikes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where there are lots of people close together, weird how that works... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago No. Used to be everywhere. That's just where people held onto it after. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago and that's the one legitimately good reason to oppose it. The city folk act like they are the only places in the world and completely ignore the rest of the country, the worlds largest ball of yarn wouldn't exist without small towns, neither would wal-mikes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago No. Used to be everywhere. That's just where people held onto it after. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago and that's the one legitimately good reason to oppose it. The city folk act like they are the only places in the world and completely ignore the rest of the country, the worlds largest ball of yarn wouldn't exist without small towns, neither would wal-mikes. permalink fedilink source parent