screenshot of a social media post, one user says "It's impressive how Niel Gaiman vanished from the internet. Wish Rowling would do the same." Another user responds, "Also impressive how quickly and thoroughly people who previously loved his work have disowned it, stopped buying it, and stopped discussing it. Wish Rowling's fans would do the same."
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I get what you're saying, but why not recommend them with the caveat that the other person should pirate them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 1 year ago

    This is a good moral compromise in that it allows you to enjoy the art without the moral complications of commercially supporting a rapist, but I think some people might argue that it doesn't go far enough and that we should essentially culturally boycott the art as well, that an artist's reputation rests partially on how their art is perceived, and by continuing to enjoy that art and share it with others, you continue to support the artist in some sense.

    Not sure I know how I feel about that argument, but I think it's an intuition some folks have or an argument they make.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    That's fair. I think because in Gaiman's case it's still fresh for me, and really came out of nowhere, so I don't like to talk about them much.

    With JK, it's so evident in her writing that she had some prejudice that it really didn't surprise me much, so I internalized that quickly and moved on.

    I don't provide either with my money, and pirate them whenever I want something.

  • source
  • parent