▲ 419 ▼ But I remember it! (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.works 76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago (35 children) Do they not rerun this one anymore? permalink fedilink source hideshow 35 child comments replies: [–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 117 points 1 year ago (30 children) The episode was also omitted from the streaming service Disney+.[51] The Slate journalist Isaac Butler criticized the removal as "an offense against art and the medium of television, and part of a growing trend of corporations using their consolidated power and the death of physical media to do damage control by destroying works by troublesome artists". Stark Raving Dad - Wikipedia https://share.google/bkT2WOa5qDZKeQICR Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (6 children) They do this with sunny, a bunch of sunny episodes are gone because of racial stuff, one including where Dee pretends to be Puerto Rican. As a Latino I found that episode hilarious and im more offended that they removed it. If they removed the Simpsons Michael Jackson episode, they’ll probably delete the Sunny episodes with P Diddy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Also, Community, which is especially absurd in the case of the episode where Chang dons black facepaint to play... a dark elf. Guess it was thought that any real dark elf viewers could be offended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago My real annoyance with that is Chang was on screen for maybe a minute or 2 totally time in the paint. Couldn't they just show a different characters face or have up a black screen with the audio or something. I'm sure it's harder than what I'm thinking but it can't be impossible. I just like this episode. I had to find it elsewhere when I was rewatching community. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wasn't the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn't make it good to remove, just changes the context) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] no_username@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode. permalink fedilink source parent [–] obsoleteacct@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago That episode was officially restored in the US when the show went to Peacock. permalink fedilink source parent [–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I don't agree I looked into the history of dark elves and I was shocked. https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2025/04/07/savage-stereotypes-and-dark-dilemmas-orcs-drow-and-dds-racial-reckoning/ http://gender-power.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGP_Vol_18_No_2_3.pdf permalink fedilink source parent [–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 51 points 1 year ago (6 children) Why did you short url a wikipedia link with google? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] grahamja@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent [–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Apparently Google does that now with the share function automatically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago nightmarish permalink fedilink source parent [–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Cheeky cunts, aren't they? permalink fedilink source parent [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I guess we need to get that guy off Google shit then permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago It's not even really shorter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (6 children) One excerpt I enjoyed reading. Michael Jackson guest-starred as Leon Kompowsky, but went uncredited (credited as John Jay Smith) for contractual reasons; his role was not confirmed until later. Jackson was a fan of the show and called its creator, Matt Groening, offering to do a guest spot. Jackson pitched several story ideas and wrote the song "Happy Birthday Lisa" for the episode. Leon's singing voice was performed by a Jackson soundalike, Kipp Lennon, due to Jackson's contractual obligations with his record company.[3] The episode references Jackson's career, with Kompowsky singing portions of the songs "Billie Jean" and "Ben". Side note, why does this link above go through Google? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Side note, why does this link above go through Google? Android browser share button doesn't copy the URL as shown. It prefixes the title to the clipboard content to help hide (behind "too long text") that it secretly, unprompted, uses the share.google link shortener / tracking service. I got bit by it within the last week. Fuck that feature. I think it used to have a way to actually copy the URL, but most mobile browsers are making that harder for a variety of reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend Firefox for Android, share works normally, and you can install extensions. I have one for ad blocking and one to keep YouTube running even when I minimize the browser or lock the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. I have UBO installed on FF because it's the only way browsing the web leaves any content visible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Switch to firefox. They're assholes too but at least no google tracking BS and you can install ublock origin Edit: just saw the other reply after I posted but let's be honest, you knew what you were getting into with lemmy 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone. and people will blame the wokes/DEI/whatever permalink fedilink source parent [+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -15 points 1 year ago (7 children) This is a decades old story. The show runners themselves pulled the episode because the thought of Jackson using The Simpsons to get to kids was "icky" to put it lightly. Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children) Not even remotely true. Disney pulled the episode in March 2019 after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland premiered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Doesn't change the fact it was the production staff of the Simpsons that pulled the episode. Not Disney, permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter." Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book. That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. The news corporations had a major hand in framing Michael Jackson - who was literally innocent. So if the creators removed someone because corporate made money by pretending he is guilty, it is corporate censorship. https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [S] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children) They famously took it off the air years ago because of the Michael Jackson stuff, but I don't know if that has changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (2 children) It has not on the high seas. Also Disney shows the old 4:3 episodes in 16:9, cropping away like 30% of the image. I hate the way corpos rape art and culture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MakkaPakka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago You can get it to display them in 4:3, if you go to details (alongside the episodes and suggested tabs) and uncheck "Remastered aspect ratio" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 117 points 1 year ago (30 children) The episode was also omitted from the streaming service Disney+.[51] The Slate journalist Isaac Butler criticized the removal as "an offense against art and the medium of television, and part of a growing trend of corporations using their consolidated power and the death of physical media to do damage control by destroying works by troublesome artists". Stark Raving Dad - Wikipedia https://share.google/bkT2WOa5qDZKeQICR Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (6 children) They do this with sunny, a bunch of sunny episodes are gone because of racial stuff, one including where Dee pretends to be Puerto Rican. As a Latino I found that episode hilarious and im more offended that they removed it. If they removed the Simpsons Michael Jackson episode, they’ll probably delete the Sunny episodes with P Diddy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Also, Community, which is especially absurd in the case of the episode where Chang dons black facepaint to play... a dark elf. Guess it was thought that any real dark elf viewers could be offended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago My real annoyance with that is Chang was on screen for maybe a minute or 2 totally time in the paint. Couldn't they just show a different characters face or have up a black screen with the audio or something. I'm sure it's harder than what I'm thinking but it can't be impossible. I just like this episode. I had to find it elsewhere when I was rewatching community. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wasn't the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn't make it good to remove, just changes the context) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] no_username@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode. permalink fedilink source parent [–] obsoleteacct@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago That episode was officially restored in the US when the show went to Peacock. permalink fedilink source parent [–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I don't agree I looked into the history of dark elves and I was shocked. https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2025/04/07/savage-stereotypes-and-dark-dilemmas-orcs-drow-and-dds-racial-reckoning/ http://gender-power.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGP_Vol_18_No_2_3.pdf permalink fedilink source parent [–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 51 points 1 year ago (6 children) Why did you short url a wikipedia link with google? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] grahamja@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent [–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Apparently Google does that now with the share function automatically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago nightmarish permalink fedilink source parent [–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Cheeky cunts, aren't they? permalink fedilink source parent [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I guess we need to get that guy off Google shit then permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago It's not even really shorter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (6 children) One excerpt I enjoyed reading. Michael Jackson guest-starred as Leon Kompowsky, but went uncredited (credited as John Jay Smith) for contractual reasons; his role was not confirmed until later. Jackson was a fan of the show and called its creator, Matt Groening, offering to do a guest spot. Jackson pitched several story ideas and wrote the song "Happy Birthday Lisa" for the episode. Leon's singing voice was performed by a Jackson soundalike, Kipp Lennon, due to Jackson's contractual obligations with his record company.[3] The episode references Jackson's career, with Kompowsky singing portions of the songs "Billie Jean" and "Ben". Side note, why does this link above go through Google? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Side note, why does this link above go through Google? Android browser share button doesn't copy the URL as shown. It prefixes the title to the clipboard content to help hide (behind "too long text") that it secretly, unprompted, uses the share.google link shortener / tracking service. I got bit by it within the last week. Fuck that feature. I think it used to have a way to actually copy the URL, but most mobile browsers are making that harder for a variety of reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend Firefox for Android, share works normally, and you can install extensions. I have one for ad blocking and one to keep YouTube running even when I minimize the browser or lock the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. I have UBO installed on FF because it's the only way browsing the web leaves any content visible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Switch to firefox. They're assholes too but at least no google tracking BS and you can install ublock origin Edit: just saw the other reply after I posted but let's be honest, you knew what you were getting into with lemmy 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone. and people will blame the wokes/DEI/whatever permalink fedilink source parent [+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -15 points 1 year ago (7 children) This is a decades old story. The show runners themselves pulled the episode because the thought of Jackson using The Simpsons to get to kids was "icky" to put it lightly. Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children) Not even remotely true. Disney pulled the episode in March 2019 after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland premiered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Doesn't change the fact it was the production staff of the Simpsons that pulled the episode. Not Disney, permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter." Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book. That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. The news corporations had a major hand in framing Michael Jackson - who was literally innocent. So if the creators removed someone because corporate made money by pretending he is guilty, it is corporate censorship. https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (6 children) They do this with sunny, a bunch of sunny episodes are gone because of racial stuff, one including where Dee pretends to be Puerto Rican. As a Latino I found that episode hilarious and im more offended that they removed it. If they removed the Simpsons Michael Jackson episode, they’ll probably delete the Sunny episodes with P Diddy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Also, Community, which is especially absurd in the case of the episode where Chang dons black facepaint to play... a dark elf. Guess it was thought that any real dark elf viewers could be offended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago My real annoyance with that is Chang was on screen for maybe a minute or 2 totally time in the paint. Couldn't they just show a different characters face or have up a black screen with the audio or something. I'm sure it's harder than what I'm thinking but it can't be impossible. I just like this episode. I had to find it elsewhere when I was rewatching community. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wasn't the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn't make it good to remove, just changes the context) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] no_username@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode. permalink fedilink source parent [–] obsoleteacct@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago That episode was officially restored in the US when the show went to Peacock. permalink fedilink source parent [–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I don't agree I looked into the history of dark elves and I was shocked. https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2025/04/07/savage-stereotypes-and-dark-dilemmas-orcs-drow-and-dds-racial-reckoning/ http://gender-power.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGP_Vol_18_No_2_3.pdf permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Also, Community, which is especially absurd in the case of the episode where Chang dons black facepaint to play... a dark elf. Guess it was thought that any real dark elf viewers could be offended. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago My real annoyance with that is Chang was on screen for maybe a minute or 2 totally time in the paint. Couldn't they just show a different characters face or have up a black screen with the audio or something. I'm sure it's harder than what I'm thinking but it can't be impossible. I just like this episode. I had to find it elsewhere when I was rewatching community. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wasn't the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn't make it good to remove, just changes the context) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] no_username@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode. permalink fedilink source parent [–] obsoleteacct@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago That episode was officially restored in the US when the show went to Peacock. permalink fedilink source parent [–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I don't agree I looked into the history of dark elves and I was shocked. https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2025/04/07/savage-stereotypes-and-dark-dilemmas-orcs-drow-and-dds-racial-reckoning/ http://gender-power.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGP_Vol_18_No_2_3.pdf permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago My real annoyance with that is Chang was on screen for maybe a minute or 2 totally time in the paint. Couldn't they just show a different characters face or have up a black screen with the audio or something. I'm sure it's harder than what I'm thinking but it can't be impossible. I just like this episode. I had to find it elsewhere when I was rewatching community. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wasn't the joke that Chang was in fact doing blackface, and everyone else scolds him for it? (this doesn't make it good to remove, just changes the context) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] no_username@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] no_username@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago also dies immediately and has no bearing on the episode. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] obsoleteacct@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago That episode was officially restored in the US when the show went to Peacock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) While I don't agree I looked into the history of dark elves and I was shocked. https://therpggazette.wordpress.com/2025/04/07/savage-stereotypes-and-dark-dilemmas-orcs-drow-and-dds-racial-reckoning/ http://gender-power.amu.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGP_Vol_18_No_2_3.pdf permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 51 points 1 year ago (6 children) Why did you short url a wikipedia link with google? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] grahamja@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent [–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Apparently Google does that now with the share function automatically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago nightmarish permalink fedilink source parent [–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Cheeky cunts, aren't they? permalink fedilink source parent [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I guess we need to get that guy off Google shit then permalink fedilink source parent [–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago It's not even really shorter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 1 year ago (3 children) Apparently Google does that now with the share function automatically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago nightmarish permalink fedilink source parent [–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Cheeky cunts, aren't they? permalink fedilink source parent [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I guess we need to get that guy off Google shit then permalink fedilink source parent
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Cheeky cunts, aren't they? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago I guess we need to get that guy off Google shit then permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago It's not even really shorter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (6 children) One excerpt I enjoyed reading. Michael Jackson guest-starred as Leon Kompowsky, but went uncredited (credited as John Jay Smith) for contractual reasons; his role was not confirmed until later. Jackson was a fan of the show and called its creator, Matt Groening, offering to do a guest spot. Jackson pitched several story ideas and wrote the song "Happy Birthday Lisa" for the episode. Leon's singing voice was performed by a Jackson soundalike, Kipp Lennon, due to Jackson's contractual obligations with his record company.[3] The episode references Jackson's career, with Kompowsky singing portions of the songs "Billie Jean" and "Ben". Side note, why does this link above go through Google? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stark_Raving_Dad permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Side note, why does this link above go through Google? Android browser share button doesn't copy the URL as shown. It prefixes the title to the clipboard content to help hide (behind "too long text") that it secretly, unprompted, uses the share.google link shortener / tracking service. I got bit by it within the last week. Fuck that feature. I think it used to have a way to actually copy the URL, but most mobile browsers are making that harder for a variety of reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend Firefox for Android, share works normally, and you can install extensions. I have one for ad blocking and one to keep YouTube running even when I minimize the browser or lock the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. I have UBO installed on FF because it's the only way browsing the web leaves any content visible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Switch to firefox. They're assholes too but at least no google tracking BS and you can install ublock origin Edit: just saw the other reply after I posted but let's be honest, you knew what you were getting into with lemmy 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Side note, why does this link above go through Google? Android browser share button doesn't copy the URL as shown. It prefixes the title to the clipboard content to help hide (behind "too long text") that it secretly, unprompted, uses the share.google link shortener / tracking service. I got bit by it within the last week. Fuck that feature. I think it used to have a way to actually copy the URL, but most mobile browsers are making that harder for a variety of reasons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend Firefox for Android, share works normally, and you can install extensions. I have one for ad blocking and one to keep YouTube running even when I minimize the browser or lock the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. I have UBO installed on FF because it's the only way browsing the web leaves any content visible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent [–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Switch to firefox. They're assholes too but at least no google tracking BS and you can install ublock origin Edit: just saw the other reply after I posted but let's be honest, you knew what you were getting into with lemmy 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend Firefox for Android, share works normally, and you can install extensions. I have one for ad blocking and one to keep YouTube running even when I minimize the browser or lock the screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. I have UBO installed on FF because it's the only way browsing the web leaves any content visible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. I have UBO installed on FF because it's the only way browsing the web leaves any content visible anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. Ah right, I had that issue too. To avoid it I use the Lawnchair 3rd party launcher with a 5x5 grid, and placed a Firefox "search the web" Widget on the top row. Admittedly it's not perfect, I encountered a few bugs in Lawnchair before (though not recently), but it still annoyed me less than the default. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Switch to firefox. They're assholes too but at least no google tracking BS and you can install ublock origin Edit: just saw the other reply after I posted but let's be honest, you knew what you were getting into with lemmy 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 point 1 year ago I have FF installed, and set it as my default. (It's what links from Tusky use, at least.) I just happened to use the OS search bar which always (?) uses the Android browser. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago Essentially corporate censorship for fear of maybe offending someone. and people will blame the wokes/DEI/whatever permalink fedilink source parent
[+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -15 points 1 year ago (7 children) This is a decades old story. The show runners themselves pulled the episode because the thought of Jackson using The Simpsons to get to kids was "icky" to put it lightly. Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children) Not even remotely true. Disney pulled the episode in March 2019 after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland premiered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Doesn't change the fact it was the production staff of the Simpsons that pulled the episode. Not Disney, permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter." Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book. That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. The news corporations had a major hand in framing Michael Jackson - who was literally innocent. So if the creators removed someone because corporate made money by pretending he is guilty, it is corporate censorship. https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children) Not even remotely true. Disney pulled the episode in March 2019 after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland premiered. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Doesn't change the fact it was the production staff of the Simpsons that pulled the episode. Not Disney, permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter." Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book. That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (4 children) Doesn't change the fact it was the production staff of the Simpsons that pulled the episode. Not Disney, permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter." Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book. That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Correct. We don't need to make stuff up to hate Disney, there's plenty enough to hate already Brooks told The Wall Street Journal: "This was a treasured episode. There are a lot of great memories we have wrapped up in that one, and this certainly doesn't allow them to remain. I'm against book-burning of any kind. But this is our book, and we're allowed to take out a chapter." Death of the author, Brooks. You don't get to tear a page out of an already published book. That said, Disney's decision not to show that episode is a separate one. Both parties suck tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) parties suck tbh I hope to fuck you're including the pedophile in that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) ? I'm talking about the production staff and Disney, both of whom independently decided to toss the episode in the memory hole permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Aww dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Calling it corporate censorship, is just bullshit. The news corporations had a major hand in framing Michael Jackson - who was literally innocent. So if the creators removed someone because corporate made money by pretending he is guilty, it is corporate censorship. https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [S] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children) They famously took it off the air years ago because of the Michael Jackson stuff, but I don't know if that has changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (2 children) It has not on the high seas. Also Disney shows the old 4:3 episodes in 16:9, cropping away like 30% of the image. I hate the way corpos rape art and culture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MakkaPakka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago You can get it to display them in 4:3, if you go to details (alongside the episodes and suggested tabs) and uncheck "Remastered aspect ratio" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (2 children) It has not on the high seas. Also Disney shows the old 4:3 episodes in 16:9, cropping away like 30% of the image. I hate the way corpos rape art and culture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MakkaPakka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago You can get it to display them in 4:3, if you go to details (alongside the episodes and suggested tabs) and uncheck "Remastered aspect ratio" permalink fedilink source parent
[+] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MakkaPakka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago You can get it to display them in 4:3, if you go to details (alongside the episodes and suggested tabs) and uncheck "Remastered aspect ratio" permalink fedilink source parent