you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'm not trying to say its black and white, I'm just saying its not as devoid of nuance as I feel like they're presenting it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think the irreducible complexity debate is over. Creationist scientists will continue to publish "but maybe" arguments because defending creationism is part of their identity, but its just a "but maybe this gap in human knowledge proves XYZ". They are starting with a conclusion and looking for arguments that it isn't impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    I agree, I don't think that a lack of current understanding proves the existence of god in any way. But them drawing the wrong conclusion doesn't mean that they aren't right about there being a lack of current understanding.

  • source
  • parent