you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 3 years ago (4 children)

They worked at LMG, a highly visible company. They’ll get other jobs no problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Again, that may be the case, but it's still not good for people to lose their jobs in the first place.

    Especially not in this economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I hope every unethical company goes over and everyone who works at all of them remains unemployed for at least 3 months actually. Unethical companies = employees often complacent and part of the problem.

    I don’t see why you want to defend this

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not defending the company or the actions of whoever is involved in misconduct. But I also don't believe in guilt by association.

    Sorry for caring about people's livelihoods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    It isn’t guilt by association. It’s not caring about several people losing their jobs as a result of their employer’s decision to sexually harass women. The few jobs lost isn’t that big of a deal compared to the trauma the female employees were put through. Those people will have no problem finding new work.

  • source
  • parent