1166
Big naturals is way easier to pronounce (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Large nonnegative numbers*

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thanks for the comment - - I will fight for recognizing zero as a natural number

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In mathematics, the natural numbers are the numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, possibly excluding 0.[1] Some start counting with 0, defining the natural numbers as the non-negative integers 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., while others start with 1, defining them as the positive integers 1, 2, 3, ... .[a] Some authors acknowledge both definitions whenever convenient.[2] Sometimes, the whole numbers are the natural numbers as well as zero. In other cases, the whole numbers refer to all of the integers, including negative integers.[3] The counting numbers are another term for the natural numbers, particularly in primary education, and are ambiguous as well although typically start at 1.

    Sauce

    So it is undefined behavior, great

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Yes. Some mathematicians think that 0 is natural, others don't. So "natural number" is ambiguous.

    In order to avoid ambiguity, instead of using fancy "N", you should use fancy "N0" to refer to {0,1,2,3,4,...} and "positive integers" to refer to {1,2,3,4,...}.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent