you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, that's kinda like RHEL if you pay for the "self-service" subscription?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Yes, and I have the same opinion about Redhat.

    No issue with their actual paid service levels; it costs them to run those, and they're providing value. Most corporations won't use software unless they have a telephone number to call when it breaks, and service level guarantees. That's worth paying for; it's a service. But the fact that they're charging for software that includes some that I wrote, and which RHEL got for free, and for which I receive no kickbacks, is inexcusable.

  • source
  • parent