The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
It might be technically valid,

It’s literally valid…

Based on your lack of reading comprehension from that alone, I'm literally not going to bother reading the rest of your comment. Since it's either intentional and you're a troll, or you do not understand basic english. There is no point try to argue the political game with either type in a written context without getting into essay territory.

EDIT: For those who want to know: The phrase "It might be technically valid, but ...", does not mean it could potentially be true. It means it is true, but there are other factors involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So ..

    Rather than stick your fingers in your ears, you had to announce to everyone that you're refusing to listen so we knew?

    If that’s not enough for you, you don’t like democracy.

    you want a trump party that you agree with

    Looks like I was right,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I came back a few days later just to see what was going on, and I have to say: Thank you for proving my point.

    You didn't even try to find something to counter, you literally just made up quotes and fictional points to argue. That's beyond a normal troll, that is bordering on delusional. Please seek professional help, or at the least check the batteries of your carbon monoxide detector.

  • source
  • parent