this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
682 points (98.4% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4467 readers
1098 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I hate the exploitative nature of overseas hiring, just colonialism with a fresh coat of paint. I also dislike their in-person requirement of two days per week. As has been noted elsewhere in this thread, there is a good, non-exploitative use case in providing overnight coverage for US-based orgs so that no one has to work night shifts. I’ve done both, and it’s hard to get and keep good people on a night shift, regardless of where they live.

I’m all for doing the minimum to stay employed, but in this case I was told the employee didn’t, so not only were they not meeting even a low bar, but they were exploiting someone else in turn to do it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

it’s hard to get and keep good people on a night shift

like everything else, it’s really not

you just have to actually pay for it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Having started on the night shift in the position I was hiring for, I felt it was good. Emphasis on the “keeping people” part of it. Hardly anyone (except this one guy) wants to stay on the night shift forever, and eventually no amount of shift differential will make up for it. Personally, I would much rather hire people from around the world since the work could be done remotely, so that no one has to work in the middle of the night.

Pretty easy to be flippant with “just pay more” without considering the realities of people’s preferences, how much I was able to offer before I was told no more, the quality of the people applying, the skills required, etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

please tell me this is satire lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No, it really isn't.

Anything to reduce the hit on profit is a virtue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

that person is so fucking out of touch with reality lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

They are present in their reality.

Nothing matters but profit, and the accumulation of more.

That's all they care about. Get that through your head.