I'm not really hinting at anything. I'm saying that not everyone that comes to look at Linux will have technical info to understand why that guide matters, nor will they want to invest in learning beyond meeting their needs. Having supported windows and mac users alike, the overwhelming majority really just wanted something that wasn't a hassle. And they favor which ever OS gives them that in the way they find least onerous.

And so the distro chooser helps the ones of those willing to put in a tiny bit of effort to try something new, but don't want to go read extensively to do it. It's better than rolling a die when it comes to meeting their needs.

Trying to force people to see linux the way you want them to see it will never work. It hasn't worked for decades now. All the factions with their different ideological principles get in the way of Linux more than help it. The guide you linked is mostly removed from that thankfully and to its credit. It is also a lot of info a basic user doesn't need to know in the end. They want "OS go brrrr", not to understand the nuances of flatpak and snap, or why atomic might be beneficial to them. Even though knowing all of that is definitely in their best interest. I fully agree they'd be better off knowing. But they still don't want it. You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make it drink. And since Linux people won't generally come meet them at their level (or worse you get two people trying to 'help' arguing with each other instead of helping), a tool that does something like the distro chooser has to come meet them. It's only a benefit in Linux adoption at the end of the day.