you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 75 points 1 year ago (40 children)
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    unneccessarily rude!

    They might be just genX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (25 children)

    I don’t think burning CDs was much of a boomer activity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    CD players were first sold in 1982, when Boomers (if the baby boom started 1945) were hitting their 40s and established in every industry. I think they were actually the perfect demographic to be able to afford a CD player when it first came out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    First affordable CD burner was from 1995. 50 year olds tend to not adopt new technology, it's a millennial thing.

    https://www.computerhistory.org/storageengine/consumer-cd-r-drive-priced-below-1000/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    As someone who worked sales in that time period, yes, it was the younger crowd (Gen X) that adapted much better to burning CDs. A lot of the baby boomers had difficulty with understanding certain key concepts and details. ... And instructions to be honest...

    As for the "Boomer" commenter above: the military and government in the USA still burns to CD for a variety of reasons (no, I won't go into them). So if someone is military, a government employee, or even just a contractor, there is a chance that at some point they will need to burn a CD, regardless of age.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    In Germany MRI and CT images are regularly handed to patients on CDs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Germany is also technologically 30 years behind the rest of the world...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Indeed, but I actually like this system: There are no breachable servers between the doctor and the patient, at least a few years ago everyone had a CD drive at home (I know that’s changing), and handing out a disk is way cheaper than a flash drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah the CD being cheaper than the USB drive is a great argument for this use case. Unfortunately you can then make the argument that it’s even cheaper to just upload the data to some website. Which then requires you to register, and then sells all your data, and then your private shit eventually ends up on the dark web when they get breached because they cheaped out on IT costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Redundant, privacy compliant storage is expensive. And then you have to deal with customer people that can't figure things out, and then there's the barrage of bots trying to break in. Optical media is dirt cheap and most people know what to do with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Really? Cause in my time in the army I never once saw any kind of military information being saved to cd. Not once. Never. Even in the early 2000s that was just never a thing. Ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sounds like you might not have been part of a team that needed to do so. In the environments I had been part of, they had requirements for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's a gen-x thing, you know, the forgotten generation.

    Lived through the "DOUBLE SPEED!!!" reader up to the 52 some read-write-rewrite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments