Source (Bluesky)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 60 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I saw a job listing the other day for an “AI Advocate” (I don’t remember the specific job title). Basically the job was to promote the use of AI products to other companies. It got me thinking that their AI replacements for humans must not be very good if they need a human to promote them, otherwise the AI would be able to successfully sell itself.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This could be said of any other job though. "I guess AI isn't that good, because it can't replace ______." Why would you assume that AI advocate should be especially easy for AI?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    AI chats are known for their overconfident persuasiveness, especially when incorrect. IIRC the job was pretty much just yapping that exact type of rhetoric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments