Sixtyforce comments on Researchers secretly experimented on Reddit users with AI-generated comments

Technology

87,956 readers

15,865 active

2,795 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

I won't tell you.about civiity because

How could that do anything besides shield the sealions, JAQoffs, and grifters?

Not shield, but amplify.

That's the point of the subreddit. I'm not defending them if that's at all how I came across.

ChatGPT debate threads are plaguing /r/debateanatheist too. Mods are silent on the users asking to ban this disgusting behavior.

I didn't think it'd be a problem so quickly, but the chuds and theists latched onto ChatGPT instantly for use in debate forums.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

To be fair for a gish gallop style of bad faith argument the way religious people like to use LLMs are probably a good match. If all you want is a high number of arguments it is probably easy to produce those with an LLM. Not to mention that most of their arguments have been repeated countless times anyway so the training data probably has them in large numbers. It is not as if they ever cared if their arguments were any good anyway.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I agree and recognized that. I'm more emotionally upset about it tbh. The debates aren't for the debaters, it's to hopefully disillusion and remove indoctrinated fears from those on the fence willing to read them. It's oft repeated there when people ask "what's the point, same stupid debate for centuries." Well religions unfortunately persist, and haven't lost any ground globally. Gained, actually. Not our fault they have no new ideas.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent