โฒ 431 โผ Which proprietary software do you prefer over their open-source alternatives, and why? (lemmy.ml) submitted 3 years ago by mayflower@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 638 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[โ] u202307011927@feddit.de 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Huh. DaVinci is OSS isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] hitagi@ani.social 21 points 3 years ago No. It's free to use for the standard version with most features available for free. There's a paid "studio" license which unlocks all the features. Neither have their source code available for the public. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Lol you will find out its not when trying to install it on Linux. They only support CentOS, which actually doesnt exist anymore, and there is nearly no info about needed things. A Flatpak? No way. Appimage? Dream on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] hitagi@ani.social 21 points 3 years ago No. It's free to use for the standard version with most features available for free. There's a paid "studio" license which unlocks all the features. Neither have their source code available for the public. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Lol you will find out its not when trying to install it on Linux. They only support CentOS, which actually doesnt exist anymore, and there is nearly no info about needed things. A Flatpak? No way. Appimage? Dream on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent