▲ 1415 ▼ TIL About the Smoot-Hawley Act, Which was the 20% Across the Board Tariff That Deepened the Great Depression and Resulted in the Largest Senate Seat Loss in History (en.wikipedia.org) submitted 1 year ago by realitista@lemm.ee to c/til@lemmy.world 205 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5566633 This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot. The original was posted on /r/todayilearned by /u/MechCADdie on 2025-04-04 08:19:11+00:00.
[+] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) Please allow me to clarify my perspective on this discussion. This commenter associated a bunch of effects with the progressive era. You then replied with a thoughtful response that questioned most of their points. But then you wrote Japanese Internment Two major Red Scares and a collapse in union membership Legitimate criticisms. At this point, I read that as you acknowledging those two points as legitimate criticisms against the progressive era. This is what I disputed. I think those are unfair criticisms, as far as I understood the words you wrote. This is all I said. I've jumped to no other conclusions. I've said nothing against you or your character. I've made no other assumptions. I simply wrote a response based off the words you used. I see you've further clarified your perspective as well, and understand that we're of the same perspective on the matter. You have no need to be so defensive anymore, my dude. Edit: the other commenter essentially proved that they were just baiting people into inflammatory discussion. They kept resorting to personal attacks and flip-flopped on their position solely to continue arguing. This behavior is not tolerated here. Please report such trolls in the future. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) Please allow me to clarify my perspective on this discussion. This commenter associated a bunch of effects with the progressive era. You then replied with a thoughtful response that questioned most of their points. But then you wrote Japanese Internment Two major Red Scares and a collapse in union membership Legitimate criticisms. At this point, I read that as you acknowledging those two points as legitimate criticisms against the progressive era. This is what I disputed. I think those are unfair criticisms, as far as I understood the words you wrote. This is all I said. I've jumped to no other conclusions. I've said nothing against you or your character. I've made no other assumptions. I simply wrote a response based off the words you used. I see you've further clarified your perspective as well, and understand that we're of the same perspective on the matter. You have no need to be so defensive anymore, my dude. Edit: the other commenter essentially proved that they were just baiting people into inflammatory discussion. They kept resorting to personal attacks and flip-flopped on their position solely to continue arguing. This behavior is not tolerated here. Please report such trolls in the future. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent