▲ 1415 ▼ TIL About the Smoot-Hawley Act, Which was the 20% Across the Board Tariff That Deepened the Great Depression and Resulted in the Largest Senate Seat Loss in History (en.wikipedia.org) submitted 1 year ago by realitista@lemm.ee to c/til@lemmy.world 205 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5566633 This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot. The original was posted on /r/todayilearned by /u/MechCADdie on 2025-04-04 08:19:11+00:00.
[+] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Then criticizing those things would be legitimate. To disagree that there’s legitimate criticism regarding those issues is to condone them. If what you meant by "legitimate criticisms" was to say that criticism of these policies themselves is legitimate, that's an extremely confusing way to say it given the context (both previous comments and the first part of your own comment), it very much sounds like you were saying something entirely different. I don't think it's fair to assume that someone objecting to your statement is objecting to that meaning of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think you'd have a really hard time finding someone on Lemmy genuinely trying to argue Japanese internment was a good thing, there's no need to immediately jump to the conclusion that people are saying that especially if it makes way more sense that they were saying something else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Then criticizing those things would be legitimate. To disagree that there’s legitimate criticism regarding those issues is to condone them. If what you meant by "legitimate criticisms" was to say that criticism of these policies themselves is legitimate, that's an extremely confusing way to say it given the context (both previous comments and the first part of your own comment), it very much sounds like you were saying something entirely different. I don't think it's fair to assume that someone objecting to your statement is objecting to that meaning of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think you'd have a really hard time finding someone on Lemmy genuinely trying to argue Japanese internment was a good thing, there's no need to immediately jump to the conclusion that people are saying that especially if it makes way more sense that they were saying something else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think you'd have a really hard time finding someone on Lemmy genuinely trying to argue Japanese internment was a good thing, there's no need to immediately jump to the conclusion that people are saying that especially if it makes way more sense that they were saying something else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think you'd have a really hard time finding someone on Lemmy genuinely trying to argue Japanese internment was a good thing, there's no need to immediately jump to the conclusion that people are saying that especially if it makes way more sense that they were saying something else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future? permalink fedilink source parent