cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5566633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/todayilearned by /u/MechCADdie on 2025-04-04 08:19:11+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

For what it is worth, Jim Crow predated and outlasted the Progressive Era in the US. I wouldn't so much apply causation there.

But it also ended in the 20s. It mainly achieved Women's suffrage in the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But it also ended in the 20s.

    Okay, so you're talking about the 1890s-1920s "Progressive" Era of Prohibition and Sufferage.

    Not the 1930s-70s New Deal / Great Society period of progressivism that was great for middle class white people and maybe a little less great for African Americans, East Asians, and American Natives who had to claw their way into a post-industrial standard of living against all the best efforts of the settlers.

    Again, I might suggest you look back at the history of the T.Roosevelt to Wilson administration and reconsider whether this is the benchmark for progress you've been sold on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Okay, so you're talking about the 1890s-1920s "Progressive" Era of Prohibition and Sufferage.

    Yeah, as that's what that time period is called: "Progressive Era".

    Not the 1930s-70s New Deal / Great Society period of progressivism

    No, I am not referring to the period following Prohibition Era and the Great Depression which was an intermediate (1920s-1930s) before New Deal.

    If you're taking issue with the 'Progressive Era' being called 'Progressive' then sure. I get you then. It mostly just achived women's suffrage as a meaningful milestone, as I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments