▲ 255 ▼ GenAI website goes dark after explicit fakes exposed (www.theregister.com) submitted 1 year ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (14 children) Is “CP” so you don’t get flagged, or is it for sensitivity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] dumbass@leminal.space 48 points 1 year ago (13 children) I don't like saying the full phrase, it's a disgusting merger of words that shouldn't exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] fushuan@lemm.ee 65 points 1 year ago* (4 children) FYI, the current accepted term is csam. Children sexual abuse material. The reason why CP is wrong is that porn implies, or should imply, that there's consent on the sexual act, and children cannot consent. You are right, it's a disgusting merger exactly because it implies something that's absolutely incorrect and wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) If we are pedantic, I'm not sure if "children cannot consent" is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology. Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (6 children) Very true, thanks for your sensitivity @dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (5 children) It's pronounced "doo mah." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Wow so its from the duh region in france, here I thought it was just sparkling dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Shawshank reference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) A&W root beer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago The commercial in question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago and it's wrong, too. it's not pornography, it's rape. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 48 points 1 year ago (13 children) I don't like saying the full phrase, it's a disgusting merger of words that shouldn't exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] fushuan@lemm.ee 65 points 1 year ago* (4 children) FYI, the current accepted term is csam. Children sexual abuse material. The reason why CP is wrong is that porn implies, or should imply, that there's consent on the sexual act, and children cannot consent. You are right, it's a disgusting merger exactly because it implies something that's absolutely incorrect and wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) If we are pedantic, I'm not sure if "children cannot consent" is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology. Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (6 children) Very true, thanks for your sensitivity @dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (5 children) It's pronounced "doo mah." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Wow so its from the duh region in france, here I thought it was just sparkling dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Shawshank reference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) A&W root beer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago The commercial in question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago and it's wrong, too. it's not pornography, it's rape. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 65 points 1 year ago* (4 children) FYI, the current accepted term is csam. Children sexual abuse material. The reason why CP is wrong is that porn implies, or should imply, that there's consent on the sexual act, and children cannot consent. You are right, it's a disgusting merger exactly because it implies something that's absolutely incorrect and wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) If we are pedantic, I'm not sure if "children cannot consent" is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology. Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) If we are pedantic, I'm not sure if "children cannot consent" is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology. Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology. Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (6 children) Very true, thanks for your sensitivity @dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (5 children) It's pronounced "doo mah." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Wow so its from the duh region in france, here I thought it was just sparkling dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Shawshank reference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) A&W root beer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago The commercial in question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (5 children) It's pronounced "doo mah." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Wow so its from the duh region in france, here I thought it was just sparkling dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Shawshank reference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) A&W root beer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago The commercial in question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Wow so its from the duh region in france, here I thought it was just sparkling dumbass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago Nope, it's the fully alcoholic dumbass, not that shitty grape juice variety! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Shawshank reference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) A&W root beer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago The commercial in question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) A&W root beer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago The commercial in question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 year ago and it's wrong, too. it's not pornography, it's rape. permalink fedilink source parent