255
GenAI website goes dark after explicit fakes exposed (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If we are pedantic, I'm not sure if "children cannot consent" is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    When I was 16 I would have totally posed for porn and I would have been completely consenting. But it would have been illegal. I wonder where we should draw the line, and if the current one is the best one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    Legally speaking children can't consent, which is why it's illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn't being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology.

    Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent