you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 41 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (17 children)
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 years ago (16 children)

    What is the alternative to capitalism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Depends on how you define capitalism.

    According to the modern (very intentionally altered) definition of capitalism,

    "a system allowing the exchange of goods and services for currency, where different skill sets can result in different compensation"

    ... everything, including the USSR [1][2] has been capitalism. And even most Marxists are pro-capitalists.

    The definition above encompasses everything that ever was, and everything that ever will be. (And that's only a slight exaggeration)

    Which -- just fyi -- makes the word one of the most useless words in the history of language.

    If, however -- just hypothetically -- you wanted to have a productive dialogue with a self-described anti-capitalist, you would need to carry out the entire conversation pretending the word "capitalism" referred to something a hell of a lot more specific. A single mechanism within market society. A single kind of contractual relationship between worker and company.

    Which is an exercise in imagination and in the algebraic concept of substitution that most people have a rather stubborn aversion to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The barter system before currency was invented wouldn't fit that definition, and strictly speaking Marx wanted Communism to do away with currency so if that ever happened anywhere, that would also be outside of that definition.

    That being said, yeah the modern definition of "capitalism" is over-broad and mostly useless as a concept.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Right. That is a good point. Although Marx didn't see the elimination of currency as a realistic goal attainable within the first few decades (possibly even the first century) of communism, he did believe a post-scarcity humanity would eventually transcend the need for currency.

    However when it comes to barter, the thing is: even in societies dominated by barter, some commodity tends to become the standard against which the values of other commodities are measured. Cigarettes in POW camps, cacao beans in Mesoamerica.

    By an admittedly-loose definition of currency, a currency does always emerge and end up being directly exchanged for goods and services, even in barter systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] -5 points 3 years ago (11 children)
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (10 children)
  • [โ€“] -5 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Having actually grown up in USSR and lived under communism, I can definitively say that it's not. I love how a bunch of idiots who are suffering under capitalism got convinced that nothing better is possible and to reject obvious alternatives that would immediately improve their lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (7 children)
  • [+] -8 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Why would I lie about something like that, you delusional piece of human garbage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)
  • [+] -8 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Sure buddy. The fact that you find it easier to believe that somebody would lie about having grown up in USSR than the fact that they liked living there really underscores how deranged you are. I even still have my old passport to prove it to you though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

    You should be on the frontline-trenches instead of trolling around on lemmy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'm not the one cheering NATO proxy wars on here. Maybe you should take your own advice here and sign up for the foreign legion see how that goes for you troll.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Right, you are the one cheering for Vladolfs invasion in a sovereign country, whilst uploading a pic of your Russian passport, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] -5 points 3 years ago

    Show a single comment where I'm cheering for the invasion you lying scumbag. Pointing out that Ukraine is going to lose this war and that it got used as a proxy by western scumbags isn't cheering for anything. Go get a gun and sign up for the foreign legion scumbag.

  • source
  • parent