▲ 97 ▼ What’s a movie nobody can convince you is good? (feddit.org) submitted 1 year ago by Blaze@feddit.org to c/movies@lemm.ee 324 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Yeah, I'd rather watch the Lynch version anytime, the new ones are like 6 hours of bland, boring choices and wooden performances. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) lol, true. At least Lynch‘s version is a entertaining fever dream. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buliarous@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Yeah the only reason it could be considered “bad” is because they ran out of money and the entire 2nd half is just a montage of shots to end the movie because the producers took over. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) “Wooden performances” is the only way to describe the acting in Lynch’s. That movie is a confuding mess and painful to watch if you don’t know the story. A movie can’t simply assume you’ve read the book to understand it. People can only truly prefer Lynch to Villeneuve ironically. You can’t honestly think it’s better film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I thought watching the new ones was like watching paint dry. At least Lynch's version had some personality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Not all personalities are likeable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago I'm not sure why you're trying to argue this stuff. This is a thread about movies you can't be convinced are good. I'm not trying to convince you, I'm stating that I liked the David Lynch Dune considerably more than the new ones. Feel free to take that or leave it, art's not really objective, dude. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Even the three part TV movies from around 2000 are better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I thought that version was generally well received? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) lol, true. At least Lynch‘s version is a entertaining fever dream. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buliarous@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Yeah the only reason it could be considered “bad” is because they ran out of money and the entire 2nd half is just a montage of shots to end the movie because the producers took over. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] buliarous@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Yeah the only reason it could be considered “bad” is because they ran out of money and the entire 2nd half is just a montage of shots to end the movie because the producers took over. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) “Wooden performances” is the only way to describe the acting in Lynch’s. That movie is a confuding mess and painful to watch if you don’t know the story. A movie can’t simply assume you’ve read the book to understand it. People can only truly prefer Lynch to Villeneuve ironically. You can’t honestly think it’s better film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I thought watching the new ones was like watching paint dry. At least Lynch's version had some personality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Not all personalities are likeable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago I'm not sure why you're trying to argue this stuff. This is a thread about movies you can't be convinced are good. I'm not trying to convince you, I'm stating that I liked the David Lynch Dune considerably more than the new ones. Feel free to take that or leave it, art's not really objective, dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) I thought watching the new ones was like watching paint dry. At least Lynch's version had some personality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Not all personalities are likeable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago I'm not sure why you're trying to argue this stuff. This is a thread about movies you can't be convinced are good. I'm not trying to convince you, I'm stating that I liked the David Lynch Dune considerably more than the new ones. Feel free to take that or leave it, art's not really objective, dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Not all personalities are likeable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago I'm not sure why you're trying to argue this stuff. This is a thread about movies you can't be convinced are good. I'm not trying to convince you, I'm stating that I liked the David Lynch Dune considerably more than the new ones. Feel free to take that or leave it, art's not really objective, dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago I'm not sure why you're trying to argue this stuff. This is a thread about movies you can't be convinced are good. I'm not trying to convince you, I'm stating that I liked the David Lynch Dune considerably more than the new ones. Feel free to take that or leave it, art's not really objective, dude. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Even the three part TV movies from around 2000 are better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I thought that version was generally well received? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I thought that version was generally well received? permalink fedilink source parent