To explain my question, and why I'm asking it:

I've had this debate in the past with someone who was anti-car but didn't really know why other than that it was popular in his social circle.

I'm distinctly curious what a solution for unusual travel habits would be without cars.

My situation is thus; I rather frequently do cross-country, round trips. Simple enough, right? Well, it gets more complicated than that. I show dogs. I need to take myself, potentially a friend or two, and on average 4 dogs several hundred miles, along with all the equipment.

For a fun experiment, this is the details of the show that I'm currently planning this month:

  • 4 hours from my house by car
  • 2 humans, 4 dogs
  • 10 36" dog crates
  • 1 36" folding grooming table
  • Extra equipment that would fill a large suitcase, roughly speaking.
  • two small containers of clothing
  • cooler of dog food (frozen)
  • vault of dog food (kibble)

I drive a Honda CRV for reference, 31mpg average.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

You don’t understand, on a very fundamental level, what this sub and being anti car is actually about man.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Probably. But then, my only experience with it is one dude who felt that if it required a car, you shouldn't do it at all, and everyone should move to a city like NYC or Seattle to use public transportation like buses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments