you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 54 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Clearly you don't write enough bash scripts.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Or scripts for basically any other variant of the Bourne shell. They are, for the most part, very cross compatible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    That's the only reason I've ever done much of anything in shell script. As a network administrator I've worked many network appliances running on some flavor of Unix and the one language I can count on to be always available is bash. It has been well worth knowing for just that reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wrote a script to do backups on a ESXi it uses Busybox's ASH, one thing I learned after spending hours debugging my scripts was that ASH does not support arrays so you have to do everything with temporary files.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There actually is an array in any POSIX shell. You get one array per file/function. It just feels bad to use it. You can abuse 'set -- 1 2 3 4' to act as a proper array. You can then use 'for' without 'in' to iterate over it.

    for i; do echo $i; done.

    Use shift to pop items off.

    If I really have to use something more complex, I'll reach for mkfifo instead so I can guarantee the data can only be consumed once without manipulating entries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments