▲ 774 ▼ Anon investigates a random goth girl (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (1 child) Right, but aren't those girls in it for the attention? The thrill? Sounds like she's not getting any attention, either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's a difference between none and some. She gets some attention, not much, but some. We call it nothing at all, even if it's not nothing. It's obvious why we do it, it's the absence of respect. But we are technically wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 child) People's views are so skewed by social media numbers. If 10 people came up to you in one day and complemented you, it would probably be the best day of your life... It's like people complaining that Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day and are therefore not worth participating in (these are Reddit arguments, but still). Somehow people have developed this intuition that unless you have literally millions of interactions then you're practically invisible. If you were hanging out at a park with 3,100 people you wouldn't say that it was a small group, but on the Internet this is seen as a tiny number of people, hardly worth mentioning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago While we agree, I want to clarify this: Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day That still means this platform is clearly not anywhere near challenging the big ones, and therefore not really having a big impact on improving the internet the way I want it to. I am especially annoyed by the idiots who want to keep Lemmy small. On a personal level, 10 is a small crowd and three thousand is a lot of people. But when talking about platforms and impact, it's not much at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's a difference between none and some. She gets some attention, not much, but some. We call it nothing at all, even if it's not nothing. It's obvious why we do it, it's the absence of respect. But we are technically wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 child) People's views are so skewed by social media numbers. If 10 people came up to you in one day and complemented you, it would probably be the best day of your life... It's like people complaining that Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day and are therefore not worth participating in (these are Reddit arguments, but still). Somehow people have developed this intuition that unless you have literally millions of interactions then you're practically invisible. If you were hanging out at a park with 3,100 people you wouldn't say that it was a small group, but on the Internet this is seen as a tiny number of people, hardly worth mentioning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago While we agree, I want to clarify this: Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day That still means this platform is clearly not anywhere near challenging the big ones, and therefore not really having a big impact on improving the internet the way I want it to. I am especially annoyed by the idiots who want to keep Lemmy small. On a personal level, 10 is a small crowd and three thousand is a lot of people. But when talking about platforms and impact, it's not much at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 child) People's views are so skewed by social media numbers. If 10 people came up to you in one day and complemented you, it would probably be the best day of your life... It's like people complaining that Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day and are therefore not worth participating in (these are Reddit arguments, but still). Somehow people have developed this intuition that unless you have literally millions of interactions then you're practically invisible. If you were hanging out at a park with 3,100 people you wouldn't say that it was a small group, but on the Internet this is seen as a tiny number of people, hardly worth mentioning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago While we agree, I want to clarify this: Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day That still means this platform is clearly not anywhere near challenging the big ones, and therefore not really having a big impact on improving the internet the way I want it to. I am especially annoyed by the idiots who want to keep Lemmy small. On a personal level, 10 is a small crowd and three thousand is a lot of people. But when talking about platforms and impact, it's not much at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago While we agree, I want to clarify this: Lemmy groups only have, using this group as an example, 3.1k users/day That still means this platform is clearly not anywhere near challenging the big ones, and therefore not really having a big impact on improving the internet the way I want it to. I am especially annoyed by the idiots who want to keep Lemmy small. On a personal level, 10 is a small crowd and three thousand is a lot of people. But when talking about platforms and impact, it's not much at all. permalink fedilink source parent
