you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Bike lanes have no future in cities that also do not adopt a public transit first approach to city planning and development.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because as population increases so will the car congestion. The city can’t physically move skyscrapers further apart, so they’ll sacrifice bike lanes to support cars. If they instead invest in public transit reducing the need for cars in the first place, then there will be plenty of space for bikes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    You're right that this is the thinking. But it's so wrong though. I'm quite sure that a strong bike network reduces cars on the road, aiding car congestion. But you're right that it's not what people perceive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    What does that really mean though?

    Pretty sure any city would tell you that they're doing their best to improve public transport.

    The only question is whether their efforts would meet your subjective definition of "public transport first".

  • source
  • parent