you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Like, it's not even THAT much better. I mean, not so much so that everyone should flood it lmao. The main plus was no restriction on tokens used, but that's useless when it's getting overloaded all the time.

I would say it's just barely noticeably better than the free tier of GPT. Which makes it a little annoying to go back but w/e.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Can't people run it locally supposedly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Not people who can't afford 100k to spin up their own servers. It's going to be a game changer for AI startups and such though who won't have to spend as much as previously thought.

    edit: Basically, numbers out of my ass, but it's like they reduced the amount you have to spend to get chatgpt-level output from $500k to $100k. Amazing and all, definitely newsworthy, but uh... not directly relevant for us little folk, more about the ripple effects

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The 671B model although 'open sourced' is a 400+GB download and is definitely not runnable on household hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What? You don't have a spare $6,000 to run nonsense generators at home? Peasant...

    https://xcancel.com/carrigmat/status/1884244369907278106?mx=2

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    What? You don’t have a spare $6,000 to run nonsense generators at home?

    Really sorry about this but this sounds like the premise to a shitty boomer joke:

    “If I wanted to spend another 6000 for a home nonsense generator, I’d get married again!”

    etc.

  • source
  • parent