Paywall removed: https://archive.is/MqHc4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 168 points 2 years ago (12 children)

most of that 'hundreds of billions' isn't going to go towards the tech or infrastructure, it's gonna go to people. a very small number of specific individuals.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (10 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Incorrect. They can already do that without more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    correct.

    hell, i could live my 'best' life off of musk's 'sofa cushion' money:

    $2.5m is more than enough for me to live on just using investment proceeds--in perpetuity.

    $2.5m to him (with ~ $436b) is the equivalent of fifty-seven cents to someone with $100k (in the bank, investments, retirement, home equity, etc). now, i don't have $100k, not even close. just using it as an example here. my equivalent would be more like half a cent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    They're mentally ill IMO. Like that old person hoarding vacuum cleaners, diapers, dogfood, etc.

    The most infuriating thing is that for them it's just a number, for society it stifles innovation and wellbeing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Project Stargate is funded via private investment, the US hasn't pledged any money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Sure but a 68.4 million tax break is nothing compared to the hundreds of billions pledged privately

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments