▲ 814 ▼ Musk makes Holocaust jokes after Netanyahu defends him as ‘great friend of Israel’ (www.jewishnews.co.uk) submitted 2 years ago by mEEGal@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why does it say "accused" of doing a nazi salute? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) Corporate news media is terrified of being sued for libel by Musk, even though it was obviously a Nazi salute. So they use words like "seemed" and "appeared" to avoid saying the obvious. But the problem is, if you want to be taken seriously as a "news" organization, then you have to speak truth to power and that's going to make you a lot of enemies. Companys have legal departments to minimize their risk, but in the case of journalism, that department exists to get you OUT of trouble not to keep you from ever getting into it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 2 years ago Yeah but it's not libel when he did it, but you're right of course, only the thought of the court case costs money nobody except him have permalink fedilink source parent [–] mEEGal@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 2 years ago cause of corporate bootlickers permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) Corporate news media is terrified of being sued for libel by Musk, even though it was obviously a Nazi salute. So they use words like "seemed" and "appeared" to avoid saying the obvious. But the problem is, if you want to be taken seriously as a "news" organization, then you have to speak truth to power and that's going to make you a lot of enemies. Companys have legal departments to minimize their risk, but in the case of journalism, that department exists to get you OUT of trouble not to keep you from ever getting into it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 2 years ago Yeah but it's not libel when he did it, but you're right of course, only the thought of the court case costs money nobody except him have permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 2 years ago Yeah but it's not libel when he did it, but you're right of course, only the thought of the court case costs money nobody except him have permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 2 years ago cause of corporate bootlickers permalink fedilink source parent