you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I feel like in the millions of degrees it is fine to use america numbers. Seeing it in C isn't gonna give anyone a more accurate understanding.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Or we could use what everyone else uses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    At 160 million we may as well just be using kelivn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Have you considered that it's never okay to use America anything including numbers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    Fahrenheit does have a wider range of whole numbers to express the temperatures in our daily climate. Unfortunately the digital thermostats I had for years, even one in Shanghai, would step in 0.5 deg increments regardless of it being in F or C. I assume it was using K internally throughout the system, so keeping it in F meant more granularity (68, 68.5, 69 being more specific temps than 20, 20.5, 21 could dial in). And it was noticeable enough to where I'd keep it in F (except one time when I was sick and wanted in between the two possible F setpoints).

  • source
  • parent