you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 65 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

It's charming that the article uses Fahrenheit as a scientific temperature scale, perhaps they should adopt bananas for distance in scientific reports too.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    you gotta admire the dedication to using the most absurd measurement system though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    farenheit isnt even that bad compared to the other imperial units, what are you talking about lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I like fahrenheit for temperature "feel" because 100° is close to body temperature and is also "very hot" when used for outside temp while 0° is "very cold".

    100°C is "you are boiling" and 0°C is "pretty cold, but not that bad".

    For any calculations or representation of temperature outside the context of human activity though, Celsius is way better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    At least it wasn’t measured in campfires or number of hotcakes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Damn now I kinda wanna know how many campfires this is equivalent to

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    A full burning campfire can hit 2000 F, so this would be about 90,000 of those

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think temperature works like that though lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    180 million Fahrenheit converts to almost exactly 100 million Kelvin, so I imagine the journalist just converted from Kelvin to get that number. Anyway, using 2000 F ≈ 1,366.48 K gives about 73,000 bonfires.

    Temperature does kinda work like this. The Boltzmann constant k_B has units of Joules per Kelvin (energy / temperature). An energy E can has an equivalent temperature T given by setting E = k_B*T. I think it’s good enough to state that 73,000 bonfires would be collectively 73,000 times hotter than one bonfire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Could be a communication thing. As much as I love the metric system, for frontfacing stuff like articles, scientists have to sometimes use freedom units.

    At least that was my experience with school.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And that is precisely why the Mars Polar Lander failed.

    https://everydayastronaut.com/mars-climate-orbiter/

    Face it, the USA has defined the inch as 25.4 mm. It did so in 1933. The country is already metric, it's been metric for 92 years.

    It's time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    farhenheit makes way more sense than the other imperial measurements imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    how so?

    arbitrarily setting the freezing point of water to 32 and the boiling point to 212 and then filling in the rest from there isn't what I'd call "making sense"

    I guess they're 180 apart but why 32, why not 0 and 180?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the freezing point was set to the freezing point of brine, not water. doesnt make a lot of sense, but it makes more sense than inches -> feet -> yard -> mile (not to mention league etc.) what the fuck is an inch? who fucking knows, maybe the distance between your knuckles on one of your fingers??? the point is not that farenheit is good, but that the rest of the imperial measurements are even worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think it's more about common ambient temperatures we encounter than the freezing point of water. 0 F is absolutely freezing, 100 F is hellishly hot, 50 F is pleasantly cool.

    Now for scientific use it's fucked

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    eh, that's all so vibes based and varies so widely by climate as to be meaningless IMO. its like saying meters are less intuitive than inches and feet because a meter is too big and a centimeter is too small to be human scale. Boils down to what you grew up with IMO

    I actually do think it's "better" in one way that isn't completely vibey though: 1 degree F is a lot closer to the difference in air temperature that humans will notice, so especially for like, indoor air, its nice to have that extra resolution to see the difference between 68, 69, 70 F without using a decimal point.

  • source
  • parent