I don't expect this to play particularly well here, and maybe I'm just being conspiratorial, but here goes:

I banned jordanlund@lemmy.world from !transgender@lemmy.blahajzone earlier today- he literally posted a matt walsh youtube link and was being otherwise transphobic in a space where that gets you banned. (link)

one of jordanlunds removed comments w/ matt walsh video:

spoiler

the reason I put down was 'trolling about neopronouns' I stand by that, it was violating instance rules and was unacceptable behavior from a moderator of another instance.

Shortly after that I got banned from news@lemmy.world for 'trolling'. To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate news@lemmy.world, but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

The .world thread in question (link)

I was expressing my actual opinion/position on this, if anything the post I was replying to should be considered a rule 1 violation implying leftists are russian/under russian sway:

spoiler

The removed comments that I was banned (permanent) for were just me being earnest about my position, which you're welcome to disagree with.

I don't view protecting my rights as something worth sacrificing other people for, even if they're on the other side of the planet. You can be mad at me or hate me for that, but I'm not trolling.

People replying felt it was reasonable to call me an idiot for example, yet another example of selective moderation. on .world.

I don't have any conclusive proof that my banning Jordanlund and then getting banned are related other than the suspicious timing, I welcome clarification.

Anyway in the interest of neutrality and transparency I submit both my ban and jordanlunds for review.

update

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 65 points 2 years ago (20 children)

I used to think neo-pronouns are kinda silly, and I guess I still kinda do. But there's no skin off my back to address people in a way that they don't find hurtful. If people tell me my actions are hurtful to them, I try and take them at face value so long as doing so wouldn't be hurtful to others or myself. Seems like basic conscientiousness to me.

PTB. You did nothing wrong here.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    My beef with neo pronouns is they are used in such a way to weaponize the “political correctness” attitude of some liberal communities

    Drag is a good example because they’re a blatant troll, and pretty blatantly try to get anyone who disagrees with them about anything banned for being “transphobic”

    Like it’s an obvious bit, it makes the mods and admins look like fools. Drag got banned from hexbear AND .ml for this behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago (14 children)
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago (13 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (12 children)
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago (11 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (7 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    While referring to someone as per their preference is basic manners, not complicating what’s meant to be a simple, pared down system is as well. The mutual respect English-language compromise is, imo, acceptance of the already established non-gendered pronoun “they” by the referrer and the referenced.

    People used to call a woman Mrs or Miss depending on her marital status, wasn't that complicating the communication of a simple system?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment