I know there was some schism and moving of instances, but beyond that I can’t deduce what happened/is happening.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah I think the above comment is inappropriately tying the issue to a topic they specifically said wasn't the motivation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "the misinformation is popular, despite those involved disregarding it. so I shall believe it."

    ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Their words are available on the topic and ada could easily refute them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Correct. Nevertheless the neopronouns incident was something of a catalyst; all the “differences” had to do with trans issues in some way, and it would be amiss of me not to point out the biggest moment that made 196 come out in support of Ada and Blahaj.

    Their other “differences” are also bogus in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent