Very recently I caught myself believing that it was the Falun Gong who were saying the CCP was harvesting organs from Uyghurs but then I realized that it definitely wouldn't be the Falun Gong saying that as a criticism, they'd be celebrating it. Happens to the best of us.

years of travel vloggers going to Xinjiang and showing

showing how much better the place looks than all the cities I'm familiar with lol

Second point is false. Most Taiwanese were in Taiwan LONG before KMT lost their war in China. Why should nazi-aligned losers from China dictate the lives of the people who actually were there before? The KMT oppressed Taiwanese (look up white terror), and somehow they represent Taiwan per the CPC? The CPC knows they're wrong about this but it's still a face thing for them to do a 180 so nothing will change, probably.

To connect the dots more clearly, the claim on China is from the KMT dictatorship! No Taiwanese asked them to do that. Taiwanese were silenced at gun point. When the KMT first arrived in Taiwan, some people welcomed them because it meant the end of bandits and Japanese imperialism which treated them as second class citizens. They proved to be corrupt and inept at government and the people rebelled.

In modern days, the CPC considers it an act of war if the Taiwanese gov relinquishes the claims that the KMT made because it eliminates the face saving idea that there is a one china policy, just that both sides disagree on which side is china (it's obviously bullshit).

Here, from the Social Credit System article:

There has been a widespread misconception that China operates a nationwide and unitary social credit "score" based on individuals' behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low. Media reports in the West have sometimes exaggerated or inaccurately described this concept.[7][8][9] In 2019, the central government voiced dissatisfaction with pilot cities experimenting with social credit scores. It issued guidelines clarifying that citizens could not be punished for having low scores, and that punishments should only be limited to legally defined crimes and civil infractions. As a result, pilot cities either discontinued their point-based systems or restricted them to voluntary participation with no major consequences for having low scores.[7][10] According to a February 2022 report by the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), a social credit "score" is a myth as there is "no score that dictates citizen's place in society".[7]

Our teachers told us not to trust Wikipedia because "anyone can edit it" but that's not the problem. Wikipedia has the same problems as any Western encyclopedia, but it's not uniquely bad or anything. The only time I've ever noticed problems is with history, because history is political and Wikipedia tends to stick to the orthodox Western canon like any other Western encyclopedia.