you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 107 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Double standards

Edit: my mistake, it's not visible on the screenshot, but the "i hope you get shot" didn't get removed for promoting violence, there is no mod reply to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Condoning violence against things while condemning violence against people is really not such a big contradiction, especially when said thing is used to hurt people.

    Edit: Then again, a guy wanting other people to get shot probably doesn't argue in good faith anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    that's the entire conservative thought process. always protect things over people. kill a homeless person? you're a hero. use counterfeit 20 dollar bill? get strangled to death. rape? be our president. trespassing? get shot to death.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    trespassing?

    This is why the last time I made a sign for a pro-choice event, I made it in the shape of a uterus with a warning sign inside it, saying, "NO TRESPASSING: Violators may be aborted."

    They value property rights, so it seems only fitting to frame access to our bodies by using their own arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Condoning violence against things while condemning violence against people is really not such a big contradiction, especially when said thing is used to hurt people.

    That's opposite to what happened. They condemned violence against property, and condoned violence against a person

  • source
  • parent