32
Assassin's Creed Origins is Being Review Bombed [Due to a Windows 11 update causing issues. ] (gamerant.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (17 children)

It ran fine since 2017 and got blindsided by MS. Anyone blaming Ubisoft is biased af, or has information not included in this article.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Yeah, the billion dollar game developer doesn't have the resources to test preview editions of the only PC OS their game is designed for. They're just a small startup of ~20k employees. How are they supposed to allocated anyone to patching a game from their most popular franchise?

    You're right, it's the consumers fault for being biased.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    The game is an eight years old single player game. I doubt they had many people working on it anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So, people should leave positive reviews for games that no longer work?

    Like I get what your saying. It's not Ubisoft's fault.

    But if they're not going to fix their old game, than it should be reviewed negatively so people don't spend money on a game that no longer works.

    If they don't want that, than delist it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't want to discredit the reviews, just give more context to the situation. I don't think that there is any AAA dev that has 8 year old games at such a high priority level that they would fix any "posthumous" issues immediately.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    They do have the resources, they also have the expectation they won't need to waste them on dumb shit MS breaks.

    Ubisoft IS the consumer of MS products. But I guess your sympathies for consumers is only skin deep.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (8 children)

    Companies aren't people. So yes, my limit is "skin deep".

    (Not the person you replied to).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (7 children)

    What a profound observation. Paperwork isn't flesh. Amazing. What's your point?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.

    If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Delist the game that's been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won't relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can't access what they paid for that's way better for consumers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.

    Wow that was such a garbage take.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game?

    No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it.

    Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive.

    Idc about your buggy checklist app.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •