▲ 32 ▼ Assassin's Creed Origins is Being Review Bombed [Due to a Windows 11 update causing issues. ] (gamerant.com) submitted 2 years ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (8 children) Companies aren't people. So yes, my limit is "skin deep". (Not the person you replied to). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) What a profound observation. Paperwork isn't flesh. Amazing. What's your point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (6 children) That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft. If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Delist the game that's been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won't relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can't access what they paid for that's way better for consumers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies. Wow that was such a garbage take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (7 children) What a profound observation. Paperwork isn't flesh. Amazing. What's your point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (6 children) That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft. If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Delist the game that's been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won't relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can't access what they paid for that's way better for consumers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies. Wow that was such a garbage take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (6 children) That yes, it doesn't bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft. If Ubisoft doesn't update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don't like it they should de list it so people don't pay money for a broken product. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Delist the game that's been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won't relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can't access what they paid for that's way better for consumers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies. Wow that was such a garbage take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Delist the game that's been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won't relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can't access what they paid for that's way better for consumers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies. Wow that was such a garbage take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) It's almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies. Wow that was such a garbage take. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Yea it's pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) So what, you think they shouldn't be reviewed bad for a broken game? No, it's broken and shouldn't be for sale if they're not going to fix it. Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It's the territory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wick@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think MS should fix it, that's my only position. I don't care what Ubisoft does because they didn't break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive. Idc about your buggy checklist app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago Ubisoft isn't the victim here, consumers buying broken games are. permalink fedilink source parent