▲ 180 ▼ Ghostty terminal is out! (github.com) submitted 2 years ago by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml 88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] taiidan@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) Thought out choice but disappointing nevertheless: My stance for now is that Ghostty will not support sixels. https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/discussions/2496 permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) What do you think about the Kitty Graphics Protocol? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] taiidan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago I like Kitty Graphics. I like graphics in the terminal for two reasons: integration with MC (midnight commander) style directory browser to show previews of jpegs, pdfs, etc. w3m web browser. I like being able to use that super-light weight webrowser when working/coding to keep me focused. Reason (1.) works with Kitty. (2.) does not. (2.) is pretty esoteric so I think sixel will probably die out soon due to the user base? permalink fedilink source parent [–] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I get that Sixel is old AF but is there a new standard or is it just an open sea of fragmentation where everybody picks some branched attempt at doing the same thing and rolls with it instead? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Kitty Graphics Protocol seems to be the new one they're pushing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) What do you think about the Kitty Graphics Protocol? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] taiidan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago I like Kitty Graphics. I like graphics in the terminal for two reasons: integration with MC (midnight commander) style directory browser to show previews of jpegs, pdfs, etc. w3m web browser. I like being able to use that super-light weight webrowser when working/coding to keep me focused. Reason (1.) works with Kitty. (2.) does not. (2.) is pretty esoteric so I think sixel will probably die out soon due to the user base? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] taiidan@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago I like Kitty Graphics. I like graphics in the terminal for two reasons: integration with MC (midnight commander) style directory browser to show previews of jpegs, pdfs, etc. w3m web browser. I like being able to use that super-light weight webrowser when working/coding to keep me focused. Reason (1.) works with Kitty. (2.) does not. (2.) is pretty esoteric so I think sixel will probably die out soon due to the user base? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I get that Sixel is old AF but is there a new standard or is it just an open sea of fragmentation where everybody picks some branched attempt at doing the same thing and rolls with it instead? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Kitty Graphics Protocol seems to be the new one they're pushing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Kitty Graphics Protocol seems to be the new one they're pushing permalink fedilink source parent