185
submitted 2 years ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 19 points 2 years ago

Honestly, reducing the teaching + publish-or-perish + the constant need to apply for grants would go a long way towards fixing the review process. Academics have to spend a lot of time doing a lot of non-academic work that peer reviewing properly sometimes gets pushed down the list of priorities.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
185 points (98.4% liked)

Science

7055 readers
129 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS