35
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Sure. I thought both sides had to be proxies for it to be a proxy war.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Given the narratives about the cold war I can forgive you for saying that but no. One side using a proxy to attack the other side is still IMO a proxy war. They're waging war but via their proxy. I don't think it's requisite for both sides to use a proxy, just one. (Take Vietnam for example, US accused Vietnam of being a Soviet proxy, attacked it directly after its own proxy started losing. Obviously Vietnam was not a Soviet proxy, the US just saw beating on them as a way to attack the Soviets via proxy. Same with Korea.)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Yes you're right. I was uninformed!

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
35 points (97.3% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1024 readers
1 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS