Memes

45749 readers

1686 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

458

Forest of trees (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

383 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Credit: https://x.com/BanhmiBrieoche/status/1858838454546682001/photo/1

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Capitalism has a foothold there but the British no longer rule there. Justifying imperialism with imperialism also doesn’t magically make it okay

No they just installed a friendly neocolonial government. Jesus Christ do some basic investigation. If the British invaded part of your hometown and installed a puppet government, would you call it imperialism for it to be taken back by your town?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

by my town no. By another country overseas, yes

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So your argument is the geographical boundaries mean when a country is split it is imperialism to unite it again?

Imagine if the confederacy retreated to the keys islands, that's sort of the level of ridiculous here. The right wing losers of a civil war retreated to an island that was and is considered part of the country.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would go even further. If a country exists and everybody has a national identity, all happy citizens. Then one region decides to become separatist. If the rest of the country doesn't let them separate, I would qualify that as imperialism as well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Have you read anything on what imperialism actually is?

I would suggest reading Lenin's "Imperialism"