you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago

It's pretty difficult to talk about anything if you don't give specifics. What of Marxism hasn't held up? What is better than it? Kinda hard to have a convo that way.

Secondly, taking a critical stance towards Marxism isn't enough to be revisionist. Lenin added on Marxism and analyzed along his contemporary times, and isn't considered a revisionist. Marxism is an ever-evolving ideology. Revisionism rejects pillars of Marxism like Scientific Socialism, the Law of Value, or Dialectical and Historical Materialism.

All that being said, it's difficult to understand what you're getting at if you don't give an example.

  • source
  • parent