587
Period tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authorities (www.newsweek.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 2 years ago (12 children)

How can Apple remotely modify your device? Software updates? They have no access to your data.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

    Correct, forced software updates i.e. remotely modifying your device. Also what makes you think they have no access to your data already? Do just trust them when they say "we promise uwu" ?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

    Updates aren’t forced. You have the ability to enable automatic updates, but they are turned off by default. They also cannot affect user data. iOS and app software is sandboxed. The kernel keeps application and OS layers independent, just like Linux. User data is stored in a separate partition.

    Apple users will experience the same thing that all other computer owners experience when they disable updates entirely; outdated security software and limited compatibility.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

    Brother in christ, how hard is this to understand.

    Updates aren’t forced

    How do you know? Have you checked the code that runs the updates? Just because the phone usually gives you the option to postpone regular updates doesnt mean that they cant be forced.

    They also cannot affect user data.

    What makes you believe that? Did you write the software that keeps it sandboxed?

    Do people just believe anything that companies claim? If we could believe the things that companies claim, then the world would be a much nicer place but its not.

    If its not proven, then its not the case as far as anyone should be concerned. Do we believe in religion now because the pope says that god is real?

    And i havent even talked about code quality. Nobody can verify how well designed their software is. It could be a complete shitfest filled with old and insecure code that nobody does any auditing on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Yes. I worked for Apple for over a decade.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    You could be Tim Cook and i would still not believe a word out of your mouth.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like.

    That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.

    Edit: I would be very happy if you could use your apple employee access to leak the source code ofcourse :)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.

    That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.

    At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.

    Get real.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Updates aren’t forced.

    No. Apple claims updates aren't forced. With proprietary software, we have no way to verify if they have some way of forcing an update through.

    You have the ability to enable automatic updates, but they are turned off by default.

    No. Apple claims that only the user can enable automatic updates. With proprietary software, we have no way to verify if Apple can enable them remotely.

    Also, are you really going tell users to not update?

    They also cannot affect user data. iOS and app software is sandboxed. The kernel keeps application and OS layers independent, just like Linux.

    No. Apple claims that updates cannot affect user data. Again, with proprietary software, there is no way to truly verify.

    Apple users will experience the same thing that all other computer owners experience when they disable updates entirely; outdated security software and limited compatibility.

    Oh...so updates are good now, and we should update, even if it puts us at risk of something malicious?

    You are taking Apple's claims as truth and pretending they are good. They probably aren't.

    But, as someone else mentioned in the thread: The US government can force companies to spy for them. Even if Apple was as good as they market themselves to be, they cannot outrun the government.

    Now, it's not realistic to force everybody to switch away from iPhones. But, we should stop treating proprietary software as truly trustworthy with our data.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent