▲ 587 ▼ Period tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authorities (www.newsweek.com) submitted 2 years ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/privacy@programming.dev 111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (7 children) Yes. I worked for Apple for over a decade. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (6 children) You could be Tim Cook and i would still not believe a word out of your mouth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like. That still doesn’t mean you’re correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago* (4 children) I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever. Edit: I would be very happy if you could use your apple employee access to leak the source code ofcourse :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago (3 children) All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (6 children) You could be Tim Cook and i would still not believe a word out of your mouth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like. That still doesn’t mean you’re correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago* (4 children) I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever. Edit: I would be very happy if you could use your apple employee access to leak the source code ofcourse :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago (3 children) All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (5 children) You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like. That still doesn’t mean you’re correct. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago* (4 children) I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever. Edit: I would be very happy if you could use your apple employee access to leak the source code ofcourse :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago (3 children) All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 years ago* (4 children) I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever. Edit: I would be very happy if you could use your apple employee access to leak the source code ofcourse :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago (3 children) All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago (3 children) All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Prove it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it's skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach. permalink fedilink source parent